The Differences Between The German Philosophers And...

Both of the German philosophers, Friedrich Nietzsche and Karl Marx, have spoken levels on the nature and purpose of human beings, however, the defining difference in their criticisms and teachings is the idea of where ‘power’ comes from and what man is supposed to do with it. Despite the fact that the philosophers had separate objectives in mind when inditing their literature, their comparative delivery presents similarities due to the subjects that have seemed to fallen prey to criticism in their writings. However, their difference in ideology is particularly significant due to the manner in which they address their main quodlibet of the power of human beings with either a targeted attack or invocation of herd-mentality to support their provocative theories. The contrasting severity of views by both philosophers on human power can be demonstrated through the analysis of their distinct characterizations of human beings and how they express the necessity of all humans to either commit to solidarity or solitude. Due to the apparent focus both authors place on religion and how it affects the manner in which people think and their subsequent actions, the comparison of how faith is critiqued by both Marx and Nietzsche may allow one to secern their respective characterization of the default state of mind of humans and why they should change it. Nietzsche’s orotund and detailed rhetoric on religion is seen as the main focus of his argument: â€Å"This eternal accusation againstShow MoreRelatedKarl Marx And The German Ideology1437 Words   |  6 PagesINTRODUCTION Long before our time, two prominent German philosophers emerged at the forefront of ideology and thinking. These two men were Karl Marx and Friedrich Nietzsche who pioneered the idea of truths, religion, reality, etc. Karl Marx’s essay, â€Å"The German Ideology,† otherwise known as Marxism, focused upon the materialistic processes that brought life into our world and the abuse of the burgeouse on the proletariat. This theory later went on to found the core beliefs of communism and playedRead MoreBranches of Philosophy8343 Words   |  34 PagesTraditional branches are cosmology and ontology. †¢ Epistemology is concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge, and whether knowledge is possible. Among its central concerns has been the challenge posed by skepticism and the relationships between truth, belief, and justification. †¢ Ethics, or moral philosophy, is concerned with questions of how persons ought to act or if such questions are answerable. The main branches of ethics are meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics.Read MoreThe Universal Declaration Of Human Rights3323 Words   |  14 PagesHowever, we can already see how this laid the foundation for a detrimental rights theory. By focusing on the fact that there could be only one value of truth, he was excluding anything which was different from that. (Hayden 2000:10) However, the philosopher with the most coherent body of work regarding natural law justice and ethics was Aquinas who stated â€Å"that which is correct in the works of justice is constituted by a reference to the other person. It is the case therefore, that in our works, whatRead MoreExistentialism vs Essentialism23287 Words   |  94 Pagesor goal. In this sense, humans are free to choose their own destiny.   * is a philosophical term which asserts that there is a distinction between essential and non-essential (contingent or accidental) characteristics of an object. Essentialism assumes that objects have essences and that an object’s identity is its essence. Aristotle distinguished between an object’s essence and its existence. Its essence is â€Å"what a thing is.† Its essence is â€Å"that a thing is.† An object’s essence is the collection